@scorpionagency,
I believe there's a little confusion here about what is meant by your questions. from the posts I gather the following:
it appears you had two questions:
1. can a designer use his/her own canvas template for contests?
answer (as others have said) is, no, you cannot.
2. you then asked whether you can add your own company brand to the template?
this is where i believe the confusion has happened. I think the others may have thought you still meant some type of big change to DC's template, but what I infer that you mean is something smaller, like simply adding your logo next to your name on the template.
I, myself, don't feel the need to do so, as my main profile logo, as well as my signature is more than enough to brand myself (as I've seen many of the hits to my website come from DC as it is). However, yes, guetizo has put a small, looks like a favicon size, logo next to his name on the template for his entries. Whether it's truly allowed or not, you'll have to ask an admin, but you won't find any current designers complaining about such a small, insignificant addition to the template.
The reasoning for everyone using a consistent canvas is more for the benefit of the Contest Holder than the designers. It allows them to focus on the entries instead of getting distracted by any fluff like the junk I've seen on other sites that designers like to throw into their canvases. Unnecessary in my opinion. But hey, if you're going to get hung up on such a trivial thing as that, then you probably should look elsewhere. Such things on the template really are not needed though, as I can assure you that the main profile logo as well as your signature provide ample opportunities to increase the awareness of your brand to potential viewers.
as far as collaboration/networking, again I think there's some things lost in translation between your question and guetizo. By "collaboration", I think guetizo thought you meant working with other designers on the same entries to paid contests, which is not allowed. However, what I believe you mean is collaboration/networking in more general terms within the DC forums to share tips, tricks, resource web sites, software knowledge etc between designers, correct? If so, then yes, DC is a great public forum for sharing knowledge between designers.
I hope I've clarified things for you. No harm no foul.
Thanks onesummer, that is actually a very good response that provides clarity to previous mis-communiction. I appreciate you taking the time to go over the thread & post such a well thought out reply to help shed light on the gray area's.
As far as my request for using my brand image on the canvas as other members have clearly done being trivial (them being allowed to & me not), & that maybe I should go elsewhere because of it, maybe you are right & I should leave DC. However, I would like to think that I can stay here & still participate in the networking aspects & not be required to apply for the elite design team if I so choose.
I rather enjoy the networking / collaboration here as well as on other relative sites just the same. I totally understand & respect the approach of a clean canvas, however, I think the rules should be the same for ALL members & not just a select few, which Is why I sent a message to an Admin to help clarify that aspect so that other users that might desire to be a part of the elite will understand the canvas policy better & have the comfort of knowing they are on a fair & level playing field with other designers.
As for my company name being my account name & my signature links being brandable enough. Sure, it's a form of branding & definitely gathers some exposure potential. However, I would like to think that we each have a different approach to branding & that we should not be limited to just the username & sig link when providing original concepts of our work. To each their own own, trivial or not.
note: Contests (to me) are more about the branding aspects rather than the prize. sure the prize is a great bonus, but the branding aspects is where the future of a designers business is set, especially understanding all the possible issues that a contest atmosphere may or may NOT contain in regards to copyright / trademark law. One can try to moderate as best as they can, however there is always a higher chance that a client might end up with an issue rather than a solution when they are not contracting with an actual design firm.
I love the structure here (for the most part) and how there is a democratic process to becoming "elite". This does help for the most part in keeping the more genuine designers available for interaction with a ch / client. it's definitely allot better than most the "totally" open enrollment contest sites that are inundated with clipart/stock copyright/trademark violations.
I think it's important for me to express my satisfaction with DesignContest.net, however I also think it's just as important for a site / business such as this to have an active voice such as mine that may think a little different than others. At the end of the day when all the collaborating is done, we can all sit back & look over our notes, maybe even a few minor changes will take place here & there to strengthen DesignContest.net in their growth process via collaborative efforts (As all companies do). Each and every one of our voices & ideas are just as important.
Thanks again for your response, it was much appreciated & definitely helped clear up a large portion of the mis-communication, I look forward to future opportunities to share idea's back & forth.