View New Content

Forums
More

Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

A case against JPG

Hi people!Differing formats compared to the original. I've used Truevision TARGA Format (TGA), Portable...

Please log in to reply

&nsbp;

#1 undercv

Elite Designer

Designer
70 posts

Posted 16 April 2005 - 02:14 PM

Hi people!

Differing formats compared to the original. I've used Truevision TARGA Format (TGA), Portable Network Graphics Format (PNG), Windows Bitmap Format (BMP), and JPEG File Interchange Format (JPG) at it's lowest and highest quality settings.

A case againts JPG

Best Regards
Agustin Roberts

Back to top
Report

#2 Nrak

Apprentice Designer

Designer
73 posts

Posted 16 April 2005 - 04:24 PM

Very nice for folks hazy over which format to use and why. Great article.

Back to top
Report

#3

Guests

Posted 16 April 2005 - 06:05 PM

interesting research! thanks for sharing with us!

Back to top
Report

#4 Imagenesis

Elite Designer

Designer
391 posts

Posted 17 April 2005 - 02:37 AM

Where's gif?

FEARPortal.com

Back to top
Report

#5 pentool

Elite Designer

Designer
264 posts

Posted 18 April 2005 - 10:17 AM

Never heard anyone in graphic design using TGA. Can't believe you left out TIFF...

Back to top
Report

#6 melseom

Apprentice Designer

Designer
18 posts

Posted 22 April 2005 - 08:38 AM

I always wonder how it looks in different format..but always foget to do so...thank's for this.

:::: www.melseom.com ::::

Back to top
Report

#7 wilms

Junior Member

Designer
5 posts

Posted 22 April 2005 - 05:51 PM

I am a PNG man myself. Thanks for the read!

Back to top
Report

#8 RWME

Apprentice Designer

Designer
5 posts

Posted 02 June 2005 - 06:00 PM

Targa is used in 3D... texture files

Back to top
Report

#9 RWME

Apprentice Designer

Designer
5 posts

Posted 02 June 2005 - 06:07 PM

The moral of the story being normal folks should save images in more larger file formats in order to save image quality... is kind of off the mark... the everday person taking photographs of juniors birthday party probably wont even notice or care about teeny tiny artifacts...and they will probably care more about saving a buck on fewer cd-rs.... however from a web-designers prospective i can very much appreciate this article.