Bola Sociology Design Archives CBF: Brasil Vs. Argentina at Mineirão Stadium
Does anyone know how can you do a logo like this? i mean you need a 3D software or just photoshop and A LOT of talent and experience? Btw, i love it!
BRASIL x ARGENTINA
Bola Sociology Design Archives CBF: Brasil Vs. Argentina at Mineirão StadiumDoes anyone know how can...
&nsbp;
#1
smyth
-
- Designer
- 62 posts
Member
#2
sharie
-
- Administrators
-
- 21788 posts
Admin
#3
smyth
-
- Designer
- 62 posts
Member
Posted 14 March 2010 - 05:09 PM
It is a very cool looking logo. You can do this in both illustrator and photoshop. It takes quite a bit of work, gret deal of illustrator knowledge, huge amount of skill working with gradients and the mesh tool.
I've been looking for about 30 min. and i guess you're right. no 3D software needed. Gradients, some knowledge about making paint/liquid/splash feel, and probably the most important, when aproaching complex things, a pen sketch. I don't know for sure but something tells me that drawing on the paper before in the PC really improves your skills and results. Does anyone here on this site dares to redo this logo, but this time, Argentina x Brasil?
.
#6
sharie
-
- Administrators
-
- 21788 posts
Admin
Posted 14 March 2010 - 09:56 PM
You have'nt seen what some can do with vector, there are some VERY realistic vector work out there. If you search through some of the forum threads here at DC you can see some of the most outstanding vector art I have ever seen. One thread I will try to find...it is a vector french horn, when you look at it all you can do is just go omg is that a vector, no way : )
found the thread
http://www.designcon...llustrator.html
there tons more examples of vector realism
found the thread
http://www.designcon...llustrator.html
there tons more examples of vector realism
wow... this is one cool logo
I'm think it's raster and not vector
Edited by sharie, 14 March 2010 - 10:18 PM.
Like us on facebook
#8
smyth
-
- Designer
- 62 posts
Member
Posted 17 March 2010 - 05:10 PM
but i'm thinking that i should give it a try .... i mean remaking it Argentina x Brasilia, in Corel. Hope i'll succed earlier than 2012... you never know 
)
)
#9
Jukes
-
- Designer
- 2 posts
Junior Member
Posted 17 March 2010 - 09:35 PM
I'm pretty sure this logo is photographic in nature, not 3D. It looks like some of the splash was refined in photoshop to give it more opaque and add some metallic sheen.
I know you can do a lot of wonderful realistic art with vectors, but in this case it just wouldn't make sense to go through all the trouble.
I know you can do a lot of wonderful realistic art with vectors, but in this case it just wouldn't make sense to go through all the trouble.
working with gradient and mesh coulddo the same result 
#15
jecrt
-
- Designer
- 432 posts
Junior Guru
Posted 07 May 2010 - 07:51 PM
depending on the life of the logo, it could just be raster. If it's for a one time event with minimal application, it'd make sense to just do it in photoshop.
Why take the time to make a logo like this with vectors, if you're only going to use it on the web and some print, you know?
Yes - it's ideal to have a logo in vector, but I've had clients that ONLY have their logos as raster .tif files and they've been using them that way for years.
Why take the time to make a logo like this with vectors, if you're only going to use it on the web and some print, you know?
Yes - it's ideal to have a logo in vector, but I've had clients that ONLY have their logos as raster .tif files and they've been using them that way for years.
#17
sharie
-
- Administrators
-
- 21788 posts
Admin
Posted 08 May 2010 - 12:02 AM
I'm still saying this was done in a vector program. I lookied up this logo and it was used on very large signs, so if it were raster the design file would be huge! Done as a vector the file wouldn't need to be huge. I would think most computers wouldn't be able to handle a file the sized needed to print as large as this file was used. But you never know until someone says I made this design as a ?
Like us on facebook
#18
smyth
-
- Designer
- 62 posts
Member
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:16 AM
jecrt is probably right. you don't always need a vecor. Acctually on this one i think a combination of raster and vector is the best. the logo was used with spectral neon also, and for that you need at least the overall shape. so you have the text and the contour of the splash vector, and the texture of the shape can be done raster. it's far more practical and easy. even with very large prints there should be no problem. large prints are usually made for outdoor usage, and they are not intended to be seen from short distances, wich means the resolution is not that big ( last summer i was in charge of handling a printer for outdoor prints, and 72 dpi usually its enough, if you're more than 2-3 meters away from the print, looks great). Indoor prints, like posters need a high resolution, but they are not that big in size.
Anyway, i was asking if using a 3D soft is better for other purpose. I mean yeah, now that i can see the final product i cand reproduce it, no matter the soft, but if someone just describes you the logo it's harder, you have to do a realistic splash.
if you have experience it's ok i guess, but if not, maybe computer helps. I never use 3D soft, so i don't know, can a 3D soft make that easy? or the work behind is at least as hard as using 2D design soft?
Anyway, i was asking if using a 3D soft is better for other purpose. I mean yeah, now that i can see the final product i cand reproduce it, no matter the soft, but if someone just describes you the logo it's harder, you have to do a realistic splash.
if you have experience it's ok i guess, but if not, maybe computer helps. I never use 3D soft, so i don't know, can a 3D soft make that easy? or the work behind is at least as hard as using 2D design soft?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
